Friday, 13 August 2010
-
The Closure of Fayetteville Women's Clinic.
Entry by Coltara Cady
A roommate who leaves an empty Chinese food box on your desk when you don't get paid until next week and you're starving? Grade-A Jackass. You know who else who is a total jackass? Shawn Carney, Campaign Director for 40 Days for Life. I generally try to avoid throwing around insults, but I'm a little grumpy this evening due to being tired and ravenously hungry. I don't appreciate working all day and coming home in one hundred degree heat to be taunted with empty food containers in my personal space.
Passive aggressive complaints about my otherwise fantastic day aside, I will be honest in saying that I think Shawn Carney may deserve more colorful vocabulary flung in his direction - but I'll save you the stream of frothing vitriol. Instead I'll let you read some of the outrageous lies and exaggerations that can be found in this interview. This is a rather upsetting piece of news from my neck of the woods - Fayetteville Women's Clinic shut down a little over a week ago. It is not a surprise that the anti-abortion camp is having an absolute orgasm over the issue.
I'm feeling a little sick to my stomach after forcing myself to read through the reporting on the pro-life side of the fence and viewing falsehood after falsehood littered practically every other sentence. That clinic workers are being converted, that Harrison aggressively mocks them and “makes a spectacle”, that he “brags about doing god's work”, that his business has being declining, etc.
It isn't enough that their opponent has leukemia, which of course they mention only in passing as “he's had health problems recently” and going on to attribute the closing of the clinic to “declining business”, when in fact the truth is he is sick and cannot find a doctor to replace him. No, they wanted to make it sound like their vigils were successful and in fact the miraculous source of the clinic closing – I might mention that this so called decline of business has absolutely no sources I can find. Hell, even these assholes were honest about the issue.
This method of reporting seems to be a common phenomenon, however. I'd like to point out this article on this issue, which makes mentions of statements by Juliet Cassell. Fayetteville coordinator for 40 Days for Life:
“She is also hoping abortions will stop at the local Planned Parenthood abortion business, which may benefit from the closing of its main competition. It gives women the dangerous abortion drug that has killed anywhere from 13 to dozens of women worldwide and injured more than 1,100 women in the United States along as of 2006 FDA figures.”
Goodness, isn't that convincing? Thanks, Mr. Ertelt! It was great of you to not offer specific information on the drug or deaths! I also loved the absurd and unimpressive range of “anywhere from 13 to dozens of women worldwide” - caffeine can do better than that if you leave the statistics and details just as vague.
The commentary has honestly been an unpleasantly fascinating read for me – just when you think that the irrationality of radical pro-life Christianity can't get any worse or more vulgar, it does. Just for one quote out of many you can find on that page and a couple others here and here:
“Dr. William Harrison murdered thousands of children. His leukemia is just the beginning of the horrific karma he must now endure!
Rape and Incest are one thing, murdering because you fail to take responsibility for your actions is impossible to justify. If these women go to the back alleys then that is where they deserve to be!
Oh, and I’m a HUGE Liberal, no bleeding heart can stand by and watch the taking of innocent lives, legal or not!”
Heh. I don't think I even need to go into dismantling that. There are some delightful commentators who did that for me!
I pass the clinic frequently and witnessed when they were being picketed by the 40 Days For Life group. A few days before I got on a plane for Columbus – meaning less than two weeks before the clinic was closed – I drove by to see a woman praying outside their doors. She was in a fetal position on their lawn with her hands clasped desperately beneath her forehead. This seemingly peaceful display filled me with an inexplicable rage; this woman and those like her are willfully ignorant of so much I have trouble not seething in disgust. There is too much that roars through my mind in a torrential flood of intellectual offense for me to not become angry.
The next closest location for a woman to receive a safe surgical abortion is Tulsa, followed by Little Rock. The Woman's Clinic was one of two places in the entire state where a woman could seek surgical abortion. There are still medicinal abortions available at the local Planned Parenthood, but of course there are going to be cases where methods other than the pill are going to be required. The loss of this clinic is a tragedy.
Dr. William F. Harrison is a brave man – through the years he has had his office firebombed, been vandalized and been a victim of invasion, received death threats against himself and his family, and remained in practice even as his colleagues were being attacked and murdered. I vaguely remember reading about him before and taking note of the fact that he considered himself a friend of the late Dr. Tiller. The fact they knew each other better than being mere colleagues in the field told me something about what kind of threat loomed over Harrison every day of his life. [1] [2] It also says much that many call him a hero.
I wish Bill all the best in making a full recovery.
Post a Comment
- Back to Zerowing21's Xanga Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in Zerowing21's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)



Comments (28)
For fuck's sake, can't people just let other people do as they want with their lives? I'm no fan of abortion, but I would certainly never sit outside of a clinic and make all these women feel worse than they probably already do. It's a hard decision to make in most cases.
You would think true Christians like they claim to be would be more about helping these women through a difficult time, rather than making a spectacle of them. If there actually is a God, I don't suppose He'd be very happy about what people are doing in His name.
All because of the homunculus... The greatest crimes of theism might be stopping to take pictures, putting the good above the true, and not following ideas to their conclusions.
I kill a kid every month down the toilet.
anyway, these ladies just have to do it themselves.
It's easy. If they can't afford the baby, throw it in the garbage can.
The sentimental strife isn't worth the time. People are addicted to
emotion but those ties can be broken. I was pissed that the woman who
killed the autistic children got into that much trouble. They aren't even human,
won't be anything but burdens, trust me.
People are so stupid.
@schallerbrandon - Serious question: can something be good if it is not true?
@Colorsofthenight - I have to disagree with you about the autistic being "not even human."
That would require not only a means of testing the qualifications for being human but a solid definition of what ultimately qualifies as being human; neither of which we have.
It is also important to note that autism is not a singular disorder. It comes in numerous types and each of them in varying degrees. A difficulty in communicating or a difficulty understanding the activity of other people does not make one inhuman.
As for discarding someone on the basis of being a burden, luckily for many of us the moral zeitgeist has shifted away from self-interest (for the most part.) We do not judge the right of a person to live based on what they can likely contribute to us.
I don't have the time necessary to argue moral philosophy, I am simply making light of the fact that this is not how things are done in our world and the behavior isn't tolerated by our laws.
@ElliottStrange - what are you saying? the moral 'mood of the moment,' which is what zeitgeist means, is what? a moment in a moment lasts.
good -- individual
bad -- individual
right -- group
wrong -- group
what is good for the individual has to be right for the group or it will spin around and be wrong because one is part of the whole.
all they are doing to you is brainwashing you to altruism beyond your ability and others are good for caring for you, an excuse for their short-comings. charity starts at home. good is a quality that's under another, so you're under another's influence. you aren't good. be strong.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZajIU1K3dQ
i have issues too, and it's a constant battle to lower and lower lifeforms.
all alone flesh and bone, the target of time's alibi.
you keep stupid things going because you fear for your life, and your survival makes sense in the confusion that they create for their personality hue.
dead people don't know they're dead, and you'll never remember your life. we all die. so?
let's all play chicken.
i'm barely human to them. no, i'm NOT human, and i couldn't be prouder.
@Colorsofthenight - You are clearly unwilling to operate on reason, considering the laundry list of assumptions you just made in those comments and the fact that some of it was nonsensical.
Point taken.
@ElliottStrange - you work off of train track logic from the origin of yourself. I did reason, or I wouldn't have responded or would have agreed and repeated what you said. You haven't even attempted. All you did was rebuff me because you didn't like what I said.
this isn't rocket science, and you didn't even know what you were talking about to begin with.
@Colorsofthenight
You disgust me. You...just fucking disgust me. There are no civil words to describe it.
Most autistics can't talk to you. But they can communicate other ways.
Would you call someone inhuman who could only speak their native language?
Also, what the hell are you rambling about?
Then again nothing you said ever made sense to begin with.
@Colorsofthenight - I'm sorry but forming half-complete sentences that barely seem to connect to each other is not what I consider a valid response. Throwing insults is also not an acceptable form of communication for reasonable people.
But now not only am I convinced that you are unreasonable, I can also see that you're quite the troll. Noted, blocked. Problem solved.
@Anima - we have a winner. Think about what you just said about one then another one.
No, I don't have the same emotions as you, so i don't have the same triggers. If I want to communicate with someone these days, I have to open up a doorway. Basically, I have to copy your writing style, but it doesn't convey what I'm attempting to articulate. A lot of my sentences are definitions or other uses of fragments that you attribute to slightly different meanings. Think about it. It does make sense. I am not writing like a human.
Today I went to the park. The park was nice. Nice things were in the park today.
Today park nice things.
You do that and improper metaphor. It's annoying. "Nice" or whatever "nice' is next to something else that's similar but new drives me nuts.
Today I went to a nice park with things that were beautiful or calming or pleasant.
but that's how you are relating your often pointless, redundant or thoughtless sentences.
Autohumans.
and what do you value that keeps your opinion so loquacious?
@ElliottStrange - closed-minded from a self-serving vantage. Do what works. Later, look in the mirror.
@ElliottStrange - "Can something be good if it is not true?"
I think it is ultimately an unanswerable question, because I would need to verify the truth (or lack thereof) of whatever "good" is put forth. It seems most of the problems of philosophy stem from this problem. Not having a capacity to effectively determine objective truths, those beyond the scopes of faith and subjective inclinations (of which all can be listed), philosophers have resigned to becoming pseudo-psychologists (placing emphasis on potentially beneficial doctrines) who propagate ill-constructed systems of only pragmatic worth.
Now to reveal my bias (HA), I find anything other than the truth or perceived truth to be irrelevant (as far as good is concerned). I would go as far as to reject the idea of good, claiming evolutionary mechanisms are responsible for gravitation toward certain measures which are perceived goods (propensity to avoid pain, seek pleasure). In such a state, even if a plethora of illusions exist, the truth is the only thing of importance.
@Anima - autistics and myself lack a mind (satisfy you, but it's different that being mindless). sometimes, i get mine back. i'm doing equations of thoughts. you will be wrong, I promise, unless you have control. I have a memory of myself within my mind. Austistic children don't. They also have different triggers, baby triggers. Emotions help you navigate instinct. Reality is complicated, for you can't remember words for everything. We both adapt.
@schallerbrandon - Good answer. I tend to agree, especially on that last point.
in english:
There are parallels between autism and schizophrenia due to the brain regions that are affected. Affected regions influence thought, mode of understanding and behavior. Behavior is determined by emotional cues. Autistic children have young understandings and behavior while schizophrenics show either damage or decay. Both problems are detrimental to instinct because emotion is embedded in the mind's language that results in various understandings, thought and behavior. Instinct produces the basis for reason.
Wow, look at what this exploded into.
@Colorsofthenight Ignoring the extremely nonsensical nature of many of your posts - goodness, you offer a lot of content to tear into - and your unwillingness to respond with reason in direct correlation to the last point discussed, I'm going to comment anyways. I'll say first off that I'm pretty certain that not having the same emotions or triggers doesn't make you inhuman - a typical healthy brain is not what makes someone human or not. We may not have a decisive definition for what is human at this point in time, but I think in this case we can safely rule out disorders playing a part.
A "human" doesn't universally articulate in the specific manner you're suggesting - you're failing to understand what language and writing systems even are, much less what theoretically makes something or someone human. Elliott already addressed that well in his first response. I'm going to agree that you must be some kind of troll, however. The use of scathing terms like "autohuman" make me think of otherkin who insist they're something other then Homo sapiens 'cause it makes them feel special.
@Coltara - we're only as special as people make us, the used.
@Colorsofthenight - Well said! I too am misunderstood and angst-filled. I too medicate my uniqueness with vague, ambiguous, poetry-like comments.
JT